Don't Pull Any Punches
I was pissed off the other day when I wrote this. But I thought it had just enough validity to pass it along to you guys.
Why?
Because it illustrates that the beliefs that I use to back my programs on dating and attraction should be the beliefs that you guys use to back yourselves up.
Remember, don't write checks your attitude can't cash.
Imagine me defending my honor and myself to a woman, and that this guy who wrote in is some chick testing me.
This is how it would go down:
______________________
Carlos,
Not a very sincere answer about "Style", the Game works, actually it is the best and really I fully dissagree with some of your technics , you're advices are as a withdrawel to women a sort of " Robert Greene give them space to breath" so they come to you. That doesn't work man. It works only when you really got what you wanted , I tried that last night , really.
Give us an answer
Man of Prize
______________________
CARLOS:
First of all, I don't know what you're talking about. The techniques in Neil Strauss' book The Game do work. I never said they didn't.
As for techniques, strategic withdrawal from a woman DOES work, but only when she's already interested in you. If you didn't know that by now, pay attention to my newsletters and advice a bit more clearly.
I don't have to "give you an answer." I already give answers that work for the guys that use them correctly. Your inability to implement them does not warrant a rebuttal from here, my friend.
"I tried that last night" is not an explanation or even marginally acceptable.
If you tried it, and it didn't work, you didn't do it right.
That's what you need to know.
If you fully "disagree" with my "techniques," what the hell are you doing reading the newsletter? Move on to some other lame-ass material that you can pick out of a forum somewhere that has
A) no thought behind it,
B) no honor in it, and
C) no authenticity in it.
You're picking things out of newsletters without reading the REAL deal.
It's all in my book here...
Why?
Because it illustrates that the beliefs that I use to back my programs on dating and attraction should be the beliefs that you guys use to back yourselves up.
Remember, don't write checks your attitude can't cash.
Imagine me defending my honor and myself to a woman, and that this guy who wrote in is some chick testing me.
This is how it would go down:
______________________
Carlos,
Not a very sincere answer about "Style", the Game works, actually it is the best and really I fully dissagree with some of your technics , you're advices are as a withdrawel to women a sort of " Robert Greene give them space to breath" so they come to you. That doesn't work man. It works only when you really got what you wanted , I tried that last night , really.
Give us an answer
Man of Prize
______________________
CARLOS:
First of all, I don't know what you're talking about. The techniques in Neil Strauss' book The Game do work. I never said they didn't.
As for techniques, strategic withdrawal from a woman DOES work, but only when she's already interested in you. If you didn't know that by now, pay attention to my newsletters and advice a bit more clearly.
I don't have to "give you an answer." I already give answers that work for the guys that use them correctly. Your inability to implement them does not warrant a rebuttal from here, my friend.
"I tried that last night" is not an explanation or even marginally acceptable.
If you tried it, and it didn't work, you didn't do it right.
That's what you need to know.
If you fully "disagree" with my "techniques," what the hell are you doing reading the newsletter? Move on to some other lame-ass material that you can pick out of a forum somewhere that has
A) no thought behind it,
B) no honor in it, and
C) no authenticity in it.
You're picking things out of newsletters without reading the REAL deal.
It's all in my book here...
alpha man | how to talk to women | approach women | dating advice for men
posted by Carlos Xuma at 2:11 PM 
- ATOM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home